For years, the content provision market followed a familiar pattern. A studio built games, shipped a set number each year, then fought for lobby space and operator attention. That approach still exists, yet some suppliers started to push a different route. Organisations like Yggdrasil are now selling a production engine on top of their finished titles.
Instead of the necessity to rely on large development teams to produce 12–24 releases per year, a supplier can turn the building process into a packaged product. Partners then create games through prompts, receive a ready-to-certify output, and keep ownership of what they made.
Casino Market presents a brand-new look at a fresh business model that could reshape how suppliers earn money, studios manage cost, and operators think about proprietary content.
Order a turnkey gambling platform with top software from the world’s most renowned developers. Buy games and other systems from Casino Market to suit your platform with tier-one products.
Why Reskins Took Over
Slot production has never been cheap, and it rarely moved fast. A single title could require a six-figure budget, plus long lead times that made trend-chasing almost impossible. Under that pressure, many studios chose to reuse what already worked and adjust the surface layer.
That compromise created a visible industry problem. Operators received piles of near-identical releases, while players learned to recognise repetition after a short session. Over time, the lobby filled up, yet novelty became harder to find.
The traditional pipeline that evokes compromises that hurt content quality:
- high cost per release;
- long development cycles;
- bebuilt tech components;
- volume pressure from distribution partners;
- player fatigue from repetition.
Fresh Foundations
A new model rarely lands well if the underlying business stays shaky.
In this case, Yggdrasil started with four priorities that shaped the turnaround:
Efficiency
The early phase focused on internal simplification. Headcount moved from about 190 people to roughly 110. On top of that, a large share of the team changed during the transition. That kind of restructuring is never comfortable. Still, it created a sharper operating shape, with less drag from roles that no longer matched the future workflow.
Sustainability
The next step tackled technical debt. The platform stack was described as outdated and difficult to maintain, which limited scalability. The supplier rebuilt the platform, refreshed back-office components, and prepared new tools that support a faster production rhythm.
Cloud Migration
A key milestone was a complete move to AWS. Before that migration, throughput sat around 6,000 transactions per second. After the transition, the same environment could handle more than 200,000 events per second without stability issues.
New Product Focus
The innovation was not just another slot series or mechanic. The refreshed offer became the platform itself and was positioned as a core commercial asset. That decision matters because it changes how revenue can scale. A studio can only ship so many titles per year through a classic model, even with a strong team. A tool-based approach grows through adoption, instead of internal output.
Changes in Real Terms
Visual delivery already has many shortcuts across the market, and plenty of them produce shallow results. The harder constraint lies in maths design, server logic, and the long chain of handoffs that slows iteration.
The Yggdrasil’s Game in a Box product targets the slowest part of the pipeline. The supplier built a prompt-driven engine that turns a creator’s detailed description into a playable core quickly, then supports rapid refinement before final production steps.
The model replaces a long chain with a faster loop:
- A creator writes a detailed prompt that defines mechanics and intended maths behaviour. This step may take one to two hours when done properly.
- The engine converts that prompt into a playable server-side core quickly with an early demo.
- Front-end work then builds on top through a standard framework, so art and animation can plug into a consistent structure.
- Iteration happens in quick cycles, so a creator can tweak dozens of versions without months of waiting.
- QA, certification, and localisation move into a packaged flow, which reduces friction for partners who lack compliance bandwidth.
A classic supplier earns mainly through the distribution of its own titles. That remains part of the picture here, yet the new approach adds paid access for partner production, plus a turnkey studio build offer for customers who want everything handled.
The commercial structure splits into three tracks:
- Core releases. A larger annual pipeline of fully new games does not produce reskins. The approximate output is around 70 fresh titles with new mechanics in a year.
- Master’s access. Partner studios build their own games through the tool for a fixed entry cost. A licence and certification scope are bundled into the package.
- Studio in a Box. A turnkey option for operators, affiliates, streamers, and other creators is designed to build studio capabilities around their ideas.
This is where the model becomes genuinely different. The supplier no longer relies only on internal output. Tool adoption turns into another growth engine, which can expand even when market conditions change.
Pricing, Packaging, and Ownership
Cost and proprietary decide whether a platform model feels attractive or resembles another tax. Both offers are positioned as low-risk compared to classic development budgets, as it also keeps the creative party in control of IP.
Masters Model
The fixed price for this access sits at €22,000 per game. The offer aims to remove roughly 80% of the typical cost burden. Key items are bundled to eliminate extra delays and fees.
What the package typically includes:
- licence coverage;
- certification;
- QA;
- localisation.
A key point is ownership. The partner keeps the IP, which includes the prompt as a protected asset. That detail is central to the, because prompts are positioned as unique and non-transferable.
Studio in a Box
This turnkey option is priced at €60,000 per game. In this route, the customer brings the concept and creative intent, while the supplier provides end-to-end support, including commercial help.
This offer targets groups that do not want to build a full internal studio. It also appeals to brands that feel tired of paying high percentages to multiple intermediaries for content.
Revenue Share Logic
The financial obligation is based on capability and distribution.
Revenue splits:
- 70/30 for Studio in a Box (customer 70%, supplier 30%);
- 75/25 for a Masters model (partner 75%, supplier 25%).
Studios with existing networks, sales teams, and marketing power receive more favourable terms. Turnkey customers pay a higher platform share because the supplier carries more operational load.
Intellectual Property Rules
This model treats the prompt as part of the creator’s IP. That framing supports differentiation because the engine can produce something specific to the creator’s intent instead of a generic template.
It also shifts power toward designers and art teams. If those creative functions can work quickly, the production bottleneck moves away from maths build cycles and toward concept quality.
Target Audience
Studios that already ship games are no longer the only market force. Yggdrasil explicitly positions its platform as a tool for groups that have ideas or distribution, even if they do not have a classic development structure.
The model fits audiences that already have ideas or reach:
- studios with strong art and design;
- operators who want proprietary content;
- affiliates with platform relationships;
- streamers and influencers with loyal audiences;
- land-based brands that move online.
This is where the identity of a supplier changes. The business starts to look like an enabler of third-party content instead of a producer of a proprietary catalogue.
Absence of AI Relation
Some vendors promise that operators can type a prompt and get a game in minutes. In practice, a large share of those outputs look like reskins, because templates do most of the work. That approach may produce speed, yet it rarely produces depth.
Ygdrassil argues that the difficult part is not visuals. The hard problem is a prompt engine that can generate a back-end core and a maths profile that reflects the creator’s intent. That is why the product focus stayed on the toughest layer first.
Quality assurance comes from process design:
- Rapid iteration keeps creators in control and does not push decisions into long handoffs.
- An early playable build reduces the risk of a late-stage mismatch between intent and output.
- Standardised infrastructure helps teams avoid rebuilding the same technical blocks for each release.
- Certification and QA help partners launch without compliance panic.
- A strict stance against reskins can be backed by unique prompt ownership and a consistent production flow.
The promise does not lie in a perfect game every time but in a better route to novelty, because the production loop lets creators refine quickly and respond to feedback while it still matters.
Production Workflow
Traditional slot development often incorporates a concept brief, maths handoff, manual modelling, engineering work, and then a long wait before the creator sees a playable build. Changes then arrive late, which raises cost and may trigger finance pressure.
The new workflow aims to reverse that sequence:
- The creator writes a prompt that defines the mechanics, structure, and intended maths behaviour.
- Within about an hour, that description can convert into a back-end core via a unified game server with a playable demo.
- From there, the supplier uses Unity and a framework that makes asset integration more predictable.
- A playable version can arrive within two weeks, then the creator can run dozens of variations before the final package moves into QA and certification.
For example, the system can produce 17 versions of the same title within the first two weeks. That pace matters because it keeps creative ownership alive. On top of that, it reduces the overexpending trap that often kills refinement.
This is also the part that supports trend response. Under an old pipeline, a market shift could arrive and disappear before the studio finished a build. Under a faster loop, a team can adapt mechanics or maths intent during production, while the release window still feels relevant.
Risks and Operational limits
A platform model can scale technically, yet commercial reality has other constraints. In this case, the supplier claims the tool can handle extremely high output capacity, even up to a thousand games per day from a pure throughput perspective.
That does not mean the market needs that volume. It also does not imply that the business can support that usage immediately. The more realistic limit lies in onboarding and customer service, because the tool is not a consumer chatbot. It needs documentation, training, and structured guidance.
The growth brakes are usually operational:
- customer success workload;
- training and documentation needs;
- onboarding throughput per week;
- sales coverage and partner support;
- operator lobby constraints.
The average early onboarding plan can target around five customers per week. That pacing reflects a support-first mindset, since rapid adoption without service capacity can destroy trust quickly.
Market Impact
If production becomes cheap and quick, will the lobby become even more crowded? Operators already struggle with onboarding, ranking, and visibility. More content can turn into more noise if curation stays weak.
The supplier’s answer focuses on control rather than volume. The tool capacity reduces waiting time for iteration, so partners can tweak versions without being stuck in a long queue. It does not imply a plan to launch endless titles every day.
Operator Control and Roadmap Ownership
Studio in a Box exists partly to give operators a new option. Instead of relying only on supplier catalogues, a platform owner can shape a proprietary roadmap based on audience insight. That shift also reduces dependency on buying studios for huge sums, which used to be the default path for operator-owned content.
The supplier argues that for tier-one and tier-two brands, not having an internal studio strategy may become a commercial disadvantage. Under this model, a studio can exist without a massive internal engineering team, because the tool handles the heavy technical layer.
Small Studios and Niche Strategies
Lesser teams suffer today because they pay large budgets and wait long cycles, then struggle to recover ROI if a release flops. Under a lower-cost model, risk drops. A studio that previously spent €70,000–€120,000 can aim for a cheaper build, ship faster, and recover investment sooner. That is only helpful when creativity remains strong. At the same time, the platform removes the necessity to wait weeks for maths modelling.
Niche targeting also becomes easier. A studio can build for a specific audience, then expand outward if the game turns into a hit (i.e., UK-facing concepts, crypto-leaning themes, land-based-to-online positioning).
Data and Adaptation
Another element that often gets ignored during flashy product launches is informational infrastructure. Unity enables richer telemetry, and the business rebuilt a data warehouse to support deeper reporting.
The plan is to share more insight with partners:
- spins per session;
- bonus frequency and hit rate;
- session patterns tied to feature engagement;
- buy-bonus behaviour.
That data improves iteration because creators can react to player behaviour rather than instinct alone. Second, it supports commercial conversations with operators, since performance evidence can help with lobby placement decisions.
A simple UK market example shows why agility has value. With tax changes that put pressure on RTP and margin, operators may ask for adjustments during development. A faster build loop lets studios tweak without the need to restart a ten-month journey.
Launch Timing and Forecasts
Yggdrasil has already onboarded early adopters and is testing external usage with a small set of new brands.
The broader availability plan splits by offer type:
- Studio in a Box can start earlier because it runs internally.
- Masters access opens later, with structured onboarding and documentation support.
Documentation is a major focus because scaling depends on self-service capability. A platform that requires constant handholding cannot grow smoothly, even if the underlying tech performs well.
Production speed can help, yet it does not guarantee visibility. Operators still decide what gets placed, pushed, and promoted. Relationships remain the real currency for lobby access, especially in a market where consolidation funnels attention toward a smaller set of suppliers.
Commercial traction still depends on these basics:
- operator relationships;
- smart launch partnerships;
- flexible commercial terms;
- focus on a few priority customers;
- proof through early top-lobby performance.
The supplier also points to a practical advantage of lower costs. When your build budget drops, you can accept more aggressive commercial terms for a period, just to secure placement. That approach can create proof points, which then helps convince other operators to onboard the title.
In the future, dedicated account support can help smaller studios push their releases. That would align with the platform model, since partner success results in tool adoption, which drives the supplier’s revenue growth.
Yggdrasil expects very strong commercial expansion over the next two years. Growth goals are set above 100% year-on-year in 2026 and 2027 and depend on multiple revenue streams.
That multi-track model is also presented as a hedge against market swings. Operators can exit markets for reasons outside supplier control, and some regions can decline suddenly. Tool adoption and third-party output offer an alternative engine when one geography underperforms.
The main constraint is not technical capacity. Support scale, onboarding discipline, and commercial coverage decide whether demand converts into sustainable income.
A realistic constraint list:
- Onboarding speed. Each customer needs guidance before they can ship quality output.
- Service efficiency. Poor support can kill adoption faster than pricing can help it.
- Sales and partner management capacity. Distribution still needs people and relationships.
- Operator lobby bandwidth. Too many releases can reduce the impact of each launch.
The supplier frames the end goal to become the place where games get built, not only a brand that ships a catalogue. In that vision, Game in a Box becomes a stamp that signals novelty, so players know they are not about to play the same format again.
That ambition also aims to level the playing field. Large suppliers can dominate through volume, pricing pressure, and operator relationships. A platform-led model tries to change the competition surface as it makes production capability more accessible to smaller teams and new creators.
It also reframes innovation. Instead of only focusing on mechanics, the business model focuses on how games get produced, iterated, and delivered. The pitch is that removing the maths and server bottleneck frees creators to explore more ambitious designs, then refine quickly until the experience works.
The Main Things about the Platform-Led Supplier Model
This new approach shifts the supplier role from content factory to production enabler. It also creates a clearer path for studios and operators that want unique IP without classic development budgets.
Key aspects about Ygdrassil’s content creation changes:
- The biggest shift is the workflow, because fast iteration keeps creators in control and reduces late-stage compromise.
- Fixed-price tool access bundles licence, QA, certification, and localisation, which removes common launch friction.
- Ownership of prompts and IP supports the no-reskins promise, yet governance still matters under scale pressure.
- Turnkey builds give operators a route to proprietary content without the necessity to set up a studio for huge sums.
- Distribution remains decisive, so relationships and positioning still determine which games win attention.
If you want to explore this model for your own roadmap, get in touch with Casino Market managers. Our experts will help you start with one pilot title, then scale only after you see performance proof.
Order a turnkey gambling project with all the necessary software from Yggdrasil and other top vendors.
Have questions or want to order services?
Contact our consultants:
- e-mail: manager@casino-market.com
- feedback form.
Check the information used to contact us carefully. It is necessary for your safety.
Fraudsters can use contacts that look like ours to scam customers. Therefore, we ask you to enter only the addresses that are indicated on our official website.
Be careful! Our team is not responsible for the activities of persons using similar contact details.
