Player Psychology Studies: Gap Between Session Perception and Statistics

Several psychological tests show that users can unknowingly distort memories of gaming session results, exaggerating winnings and downplaying unsuccessful bets. Comparing subjective estimations with actual statistics reveals how personal results are perceived.

Casino Market has analysed a few cases showing how loss size and the gambler’s experience influence attitudes toward the content. We can help you build a strong business plan to target specific audience segments effectively.

Order Service

Cambridge Health Alliance’s 2014 Research

The Division on Addiction’s psychological assessment identified a discrepancy between users’ actual statistics and personal perceptions of results over 3 and 12 months. The study involved 773 participants across fixed-odds/live sports wagering and online casino gaming.

Key insights and figures from the case:

1. Only 13% of respondents correctly evaluated their net balance for the last quarter, while 7% did so for the year.
2. Between 34% and 40% of the surveyed people underestimated losses or exaggerated winnings.
3. Problem gamblers were more likely than the low-risk category to make inaccurate assessments, yet they were not always favourably biased.

The study showed that users’ memory tends to frame the ratio of successful and non-winning bets. The longer a person plays, the more pronounced this discrepancy becomes.

Nottingham Trent University and Neccton’s Case

Published in 2016, this research compared 1,335 gamblers' self-assessments with their actual account data over a month. The covered projects included lotteries, casinos, scratch cards, sportsbooks, and VLTs.

Key insights were as follows:

1. Across all verticals, 74% of participants cited figures close to the real-world statistics. Around 17% skewed the results in their favour, while 9% did the opposite.
2. For the casino segment solely, 71% of surveyed people gave correct answers. About 16% exaggerated losses or underestimated wins, and 13% did vice versa.
3. Lottery enthusiasts have the highest percentage of accurate evaluation, whereas scratch-card fans and sports bettors have the lowest.

Large losses reduce recall precision, even in the short term. Meanwhile, the gaming experience amplifies this effect.

Yale and Bangor Universities’ 2018 Research

The 2 institutions’ Schools of Medicine (Department of Psychiatry) and Psychology examined how slot speed affects assessments of session results. Participants played on a simulator and subsequently reported the amount wagered and the number of wins.

The main findings were as follows:

1. Quick rounds resulted in the highest spending and the poorest recall accuracy.
2. A slower pace improved memory precision for expenditures and successful bets.
3. Individual Rate-of-Play (I-ROP) preferences ranged from 0.5 to 7 seconds per spin.
4. Exceeding the I-ROP impaired recall accuracy for amounts users spent and won.

These results demonstrate that session characteristics can influence how its outcome is perceived. The faster the game, the less effectively the gambler tracks and remembers the action. Additionally, the product’s audio accompaniment has a similar effect on the player.

University of Sydney: School of Psychology’s Study

In 2022, Australian researchers tested whether direct instructions would affect the accuracy of estimates. They explained the calculation method to 652 participants and asked them to recall the net result over 30 days.

The survey revealed the following:

1. Only 4.09% of participants assessed the balance within a 10% error margin.
2. Around 64.79% of the players underestimated the size of losses.
3. Finally, 69.63% underrated the number of bets placed.

The study showed that understanding the calculation formula does not eliminate memory bias. Nevertheless, enlightening customers about game rules, including RTP and volatility nuances, remains a crucial part of responsible gambling practices.

The Main Things About the Psychology of Casino Players

Content mathematics is defined by return percentages and the payout model. Meanwhile, user impressions come from sensorially vivid fragments.

How gameplay affects memory reveals a key driver of audience retention. Engagement extends beyond the session itself, as reminiscences of the experience shape the motivation for the next rounds.

Here is the list of the main study insights from the article:

• Biased recall. Most gamblers tend to exaggerate their winnings or underestimate losses.
• Vertical differences. Accuracy of personal evaluations varies across iGaming products, with lottery fans generally remembering results more precisely.
• Round speed effects. Faster spin pace usually impairs impressions of spending and successful wagers.
• Persistent misjudgment. Explaining calculation methods does not eliminate errors in assessing financial outcomes.

Our team monitors case studies that can help operators better understand their audiences. We also help build online casino marketing strategies with high engagement and retention potential.

For more details on available services and partnership aspects, feel free to contact us. Our managers will offer you the most suitable options for your request.

Order Service

May Terrell Copywriter

Have questions or want to order services?
Contact our consultants:

• e-mail: manager@casino-market.com
• feedback form.